[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bfff810-2484-40cc-aee1-7827201aceee@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:16:49 -0600
From: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, Junfeng Guo <junfeng.guo@...el.com>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Marcin
Szycik" <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>, <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 02/13] ice: parse and init
various DDP parser sections
On 2024-07-10 11:28 p.m., Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Ahmed, dear Junfeng,
>
>
> Thank you for this patch.
>
>
> Am 10.07.24 um 22:40 schrieb Ahmed Zaki:
>> From: Junfeng Guo <junfeng.guo@...el.com>
>>
>> Parse the following DDP sections:
>> - ICE_SID_RXPARSER_IMEM into an array of struct ice_imem_item
>> - ICE_SID_RXPARSER_METADATA_INIT into an array of struct
>> ice_metainit_item
>> - ICE_SID_RXPARSER_CAM or ICE_SID_RXPARSER_PG_SPILL into an array of
>> struct ice_pg_cam_item
>> - ICE_SID_RXPARSER_NOMATCH_CAM or ICE_SID_RXPARSER_NOMATCH_SPILL
>> into an
>> array of struct ice_pg_nm_cam_item
>> - ICE_SID_RXPARSER_CAM into an array of ice_bst_tcam_item
>> - ICE_SID_LBL_RXPARSER_TMEM into an array of ice_lbl_item
>> - ICE_SID_RXPARSER_MARKER_PTYPE into an array of ice_ptype_mk_tcam_item
>> - ICE_SID_RXPARSER_MARKER_GRP into an array of ice_mk_grp_item
>> - ICE_SID_RXPARSER_PROTO_GRP into an array of ice_proto_grp_item
>> - ICE_SID_RXPARSER_FLAG_REDIR into an array of ice_flg_rd_item
>> - ICE_SID_XLT_KEY_BUILDER_SW, ICE_SID_XLT_KEY_BUILDER_ACL,
>> ICE_SID_XLT_KEY_BUILDER_FD and ICE_SID_XLT_KEY_BUILDER_RSS into
>> struct ice_xlt_kb
>
> Did you write this from hand, or do you have some scripts to convert it
> from some datasheet into code?
I believe this was all manually done.
>
> As the parser is new infrastructure, are you planing on adding some
> tests for the parser?
I am not aware of any plans to add testing for the parser stage.
In any case, what kind of tests do you have in mind? if you mean kerenl
self-tests, I don't see any other ice tests in
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/ for the rest of the already
supported h/w stages (ACL, FDIR, RSS, ..etc) that I can use as examples.
>
> Could you also go into more detail on how to debug possible problems,
> that means, how to make sure, that the parser works correctly and how to
> debug it in case one suspects the parser has a problem.
The next patch in the set adds ice_debug() for almost all operations.
That includes dumping all DDP related sections and CAM entries.
>
>> Reviewed-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo <junfeng.guo@...el.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.c | 10 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.h | 13 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser.c | 1396 +++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser.h | 357 +++++
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_type.h | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 1772 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
<..>
>
>> + * @length: number of items in the table to create
>> + * @parse_item: the function to parse the item
>> + * @no_offset: ignore header offset, calculate index from 0
>> + *
>> + * Return: a pointer to the allocated table or ERR_PTR.
>> + */
>> +static
>> +void *ice_parser_create_table(struct ice_hw *hw, u32 sect_type,
>> + u32 item_size, u32 length,
>> + void (*parse_item)(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 idx,
>> + void *item, void *data,
>> + int size),
>> + bool no_offset)
>> +{
>> + struct ice_pkg_enum state = {};
>> + struct ice_seg *seg = hw->seg;
>> + void *table, *data, *item;
>> + u16 idx = U16_MAX;
>> +
>> + if (!seg)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> + table = kzalloc(item_size * length, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!table)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + data = ice_pkg_enum_entry(seg, &state, sect_type, NULL,
>> + ice_parser_sect_item_get);
>> + seg = NULL;
>> + if (data) {
>> + struct ice_pkg_sect_hdr *hdr =
>> + (struct ice_pkg_sect_hdr *)state.sect;
>> +
>> + if (no_offset)
>> + idx++;
>
> Can’t `idx` initialized with `U16_MAX` now overflow?
Good catch, looking at the code, that seems to be intentionl so that
first call to parse_item() would start at 0.
>
>> + else
>> + idx = le16_to_cpu(hdr->offset) +
>> + state.entry_idx;
>> +
>> + item = (void *)((uintptr_t)table + idx * item_size);
>> + parse_item(hw, idx, item, data, item_size);
I will change that to
u16 idx = 0;
..
parse_item(hw, idx, item, data, item_size);
if (no_offset)
idx++;
better readability.
>> + }
>> + } while (data);
>> +
>> + return table;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*** ICE_SID_RXPARSER_IMEM section ***/
>> +#define ICE_IM_BM_ALU0 BIT(0)
>> +#define ICE_IM_BM_ALU1 BIT(1)
>> +#define ICE_IM_BM_ALU2 BIT(2)
>> +#define ICE_IM_BM_PG BIT(3)
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * ice_imem_bm_init - parse 4 bits of Boost Main
>> + * @bm: pointer to the Boost Main structure
>> + * @data: Boost Main data to be parsed
>
> Excuse my ignorance, as you use `data` in `FIELD_GET()` is `data` the
> right name? The `FIELD_GET()` example in `include/linux/bitfield.h` uses
> `reg`. How do I know the valid values of `data`?
This and the following funcs parse the DDP sections. so 'data' is not
always register values.
>
>> + */
>> +static void ice_imem_bm_init(struct ice_bst_main *bm, u8 data)
>> +{
>> + bm->alu0 = FIELD_GET(ICE_IM_BM_ALU0, data);
>> + bm->alu1 = FIELD_GET(ICE_IM_BM_ALU1, data);
>> + bm->alu2 = FIELD_GET(ICE_IM_BM_ALU2, data);
>> + bm->pg = FIELD_GET(ICE_IM_BM_PG, data);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define ICE_IM_BKB_PRIO GENMASK(7, 0)
>> +#define ICE_IM_BKB_TSR_CTRL BIT(8)
>
<..>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser.h
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser.h
>> index 09ed380eee32..26468b16202c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser.h
>> @@ -4,8 +4,365 @@
>> #ifndef _ICE_PARSER_H_
>> #define _ICE_PARSER_H_
>> +#define ICE_SEC_DATA_OFFSET 4
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_IMEM_ENTRY_SIZE 48
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_METADATA_INIT_ENTRY_SIZE 24
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_CAM_ENTRY_SIZE 16
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_PG_SPILL_ENTRY_SIZE 17
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_NOMATCH_CAM_ENTRY_SIZE 12
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_NOMATCH_SPILL_ENTRY_SIZE 13
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_BOOST_TCAM_ENTRY_SIZE 88
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_MARKER_TYPE_ENTRY_SIZE 24
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_MARKER_GRP_ENTRY_SIZE 8
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_PROTO_GRP_ENTRY_SIZE 24
>> +#define ICE_SID_RXPARSER_FLAG_REDIR_ENTRY_SIZE 1
>> +
>> +#define ICE_SEC_LBL_DATA_OFFSET 2
>> +#define ICE_SID_LBL_ENTRY_SIZE 66
>> +
>> +/*** ICE_SID_RXPARSER_IMEM section ***/
>> +#define ICE_IMEM_TABLE_SIZE 192
>> +
>> +/* TCAM boost Master; if bit is set, and TCAM hit, TCAM output
>> overrides iMEM
>> + * output.
>> + */
>> +struct ice_bst_main {
>> + bool alu0;
>> + bool alu1;
>> + bool alu2;
>> + bool pg;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct ice_bst_keybuilder {
>> + u8 prio;
>
> Add a comment, what `prio` is and what values are allowed?
Will do.
thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists