[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <250854fc-ce22-4866-95f9-d61f6653af64@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:59:54 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Michal Switala <michal.switala@...ogain.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, revest@...gle.com,
syzbot+cca39e6e84a367a7e6f6@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
<toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Ensure BPF programs testing skb context
initialization
On 7/15/24 11:13 AM, Michal Switala wrote:
>> Reported-by: syzbot+cca39e6e84a367a7e6f6@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=cca39e6e84a367a7e6f6
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000b95d41061cbf302a@google.com/
>
> Something doesn't add up.
> This syzbot report is about:
>
> dev_map_enqueue+0x31/0x3e0 kernel/bpf/devmap.c:539
> __xdp_do_redirect_frame net/core/filter.c:4397 [inline]
> bpf_prog_test_run_xdp
>
> why you're fixing bpf_prog_test_run_skb ?
[ Please keep the relevant email context in the reply ]
> The reproducer calls the methods bpf_prog_test_run_xdp and
> bpf_prog_test_run_skb. Both lead to the invocation of dev_map_enqueue, in the
The syzbot report is triggering from the bpf_prog_test_run_xdp. I agree with
Alexei that fixing the bpf_prog_test_run_skb does not make sense. At least I
don't see how dev_map_enqueue can be used from bpf_prog_test_run_skb.
It looks very similar to
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000f6531b061494e696@google.com/. It has
been fixed in commit 5bcf0dcbf906 ("xdp: use flags field to disambiguate
broadcast redirect")
I tried the C repro. I can reproduce in the bpf tree also which should have the
fix. I cannot reproduce in the bpf-next though.
Cc Toke who knows more details here.
> case of the former, the backtrace is recorded in its entirety, whereas for the
> latter it is not. I think the bug might be incorrectly reported on syzkaller, as
> during GDB debugging, the problem occurred in functions called from
> bpf_prog_test_run_skb. I also ran testing of my patch on syzkaller and the tests
> passed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists