netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: axienet: Fix coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240717170043.45aaf7e2@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 17:00:43 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 <michal.simek@....com>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 <git@....com>, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: axienet: Fix coding style issues

On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:24:43 +0530 Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
> Replace all occurences of (1<<x) by BIT(x) to get rid of checkpatch.pl
> "CHECK" output "Prefer using the BIT macro".

FWIW the BIT() thing is a matter of preference, we don't enforce it
strictly in networking, it may not be worth patching. Up to you.