[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d496d91-a83c-4ec6-ba69-ae594a50e45c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:49:07 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Tung Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@...ava.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>,
"jmaloy@...hat.com" <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
"ying.xue@...driver.com" <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tipc: Return non-zero value from tipc_udp_addr2str()
on error
On 7/18/24 03:30, Tung Nguyen wrote:
>>> Reviewed-by: Tung Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@...ava.com>
>>>
>>> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. ...
>>
>> What do you expect us to do with a review tag that has a two-paragraph legal license attached to it?
> Please ignore that disclaimer message. I am still asking help from my organization to remove that annoying message.
The unfortunate thing is that the message has legal implication which do
not fit well with formal tags. If you can't trim the trailing message
from your corporate account - I know it could be even very hard or
impossible - please use a different account that you can control more
easily for formal interaction on the ML.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists