[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJmdGdAN1OZEfoM2LNVOewkYDuPXObRoNWhGyn93P=8OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 08:22:43 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: jmaloy@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
passt-dev@...st.top, sbrivio@...hat.com, lvivier@...hat.com,
dgibson@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net] tcp: add SO_PEEK_OFF socket option tor TCPv6
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 7:09 AM <jmaloy@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
>
> When we added the SO_PEEK_OFF socket option to TCP we forgot
> to add it even for TCP on IPv6.
>
> We do that here.
>
> Fixes: 05ea491641d3 ("tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF socket option")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
It would be nice to add a selftest for SO_PEEK_OFF for TCP and UDP,
any volunteers ?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists