[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoBQPspUNJ2QDxy=m2iut+gZJBPEkRg6yA83TsjnL==S_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:13:38 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: jmaloy@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, passt-dev@...st.top, sbrivio@...hat.com, lvivier@...hat.com,
dgibson@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net] tcp: add SO_PEEK_OFF socket option tor TCPv6
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 11:23 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 7:09 AM <jmaloy@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
> >
> > When we added the SO_PEEK_OFF socket option to TCP we forgot
> > to add it even for TCP on IPv6.
> >
> > We do that here.
> >
> > Fixes: 05ea491641d3 ("tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF socket option")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> It would be nice to add a selftest for SO_PEEK_OFF for TCP and UDP,
> any volunteers ?
If Jon doesn't have much time, I volunteer :) :p
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists