[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1eb7226-0af7-4475-a57d-e3293dbc1071@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:23:15 +0200
From: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <apw@...onical.com>,
<joe@...ches.com>, <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <willemb@...gle.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Igor Bagnucki <igor.bagnucki@...el.com>,
Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 3/6] ice: add Tx hang
devlink health reporter
On 7/14/2024 4:23 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 05:32:48 -0400 Mateusz Polchlopek wrote:
>> + err = devlink_health_report(reporter, msg, priv_ctx);
>> + if (err) {
>> + struct ice_pf *pf = devlink_health_reporter_priv(reporter);
>> +
>> + dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(pf),
>> + "failed to report %s via devlink health, err %d\n",
>> + msg, err);
>
> My knee-jerk reaction is - why not put it in devlink_health_report()?
> Also, I'd rate limit the message.
Hmmm... That's good point. I will talk to the author about that but
seems to be good point Jakub.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists