lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zp4h72rWwgnGmvcP@test-OptiPlex-Tower-Plus-7010>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:40:07 +0530
From: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>,
        <jkridner@...gleboard.org>, <robertcnelson@...gleboard.org>,
        "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra
	<vigneshr@...com>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold
	<johan@...nel.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] greybus: gb-beagleplay: Add firmware upload API

On 2024-07-20 at 03:09:55, Alex Elder (elder@...e.org) wrote:
> On 7/19/24 2:15 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > >   drivers/greybus/Kconfig         |   1 +
> > > >   drivers/greybus/gb-beagleplay.c | 625 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 
> > > > +static u8 csum8(const u8 *data, size_t size, u8 base)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	size_t i;
> > > > +	u8 sum = base;
> > > follow reverse x-mas tree
> > 
> > Since this is not networking, even thought it was posted to the netdev
> > list, this comment might not be correct. I had a quick look at some
> > greybus code and reverse x-mas tree is not strictly used.
> > 
> > Please see what the Graybus Maintainers say.
> 
> Andrew is correct.  The Greybus code does not strictly follow
> the "reverse christmas tree" convention, so there is no need
> to do that here.  Please understand that, while checkpatch.pl
> offers good and well-intentioned advice, not everything it
> warns about must be fixed, and in some cases it suggests things
> certain maintainers don't agree with.
> 
> 					-Alex
> 
> > 	Andrew
> 
> Ok got it. 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ