[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a865811-a6c0-47ad-b8a0-265bb31d4124@beagleboard.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:15:41 +0530
From: Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: jkridner@...gleboard.org, robertcnelson@...gleboard.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti,cc1352p7: Add boot-gpio
On 7/19/24 20:25, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 03:15:10PM +0530, Ayush Singh wrote:
>> boot-gpio (along with reset-gpio) is used to enable bootloader backdoor
>> for flashing new firmware.
>>
>> The pin and pin level to enabel bootloader backdoor is configed using
>> the following CCFG variables in cc1352p7:
>> - SET_CCFG_BL_CONFIG_BL_PIN_NO
>> - SET_CCFG_BL_CONFIG_BL_LEVEL
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml
>> index 3dde10de4630..a3511bb59b05 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml
>> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ properties:
>> reset-gpios:
>> maxItems: 1
>>
>> + boot-gpios:
>> + maxItems: 1
> I think this needs a description that explains what this is actually
> for, and "boot-gpios" is not really an accurate name for what it is used
> for IMO.
I was using the name `boot-gpios` since cc1352-flasher uses the name
boot-line. Anyway, would `bsl-gpios` be better? Or for more descriptive
names, I guess it can be `bootloader-config-gpios` or
`bootloader-backdoor-gpios`.
Ayush Singh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists