[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1724f480-369d-4b4a-9384-1c6b33b00433@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:35:00 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, kvalo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
conor+dt@...nel.org, arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com
Cc: efectn@...tonmail.com, dsimic@...jaro.org, jagan@...eble.ai,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arend@...adcom.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
megi@....cz, duoming@....edu.cn, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
minipli@...ecurity.net, brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, nick@...das.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] dt-bindings: net: wireless: brcm4329-fmac: add
clock description for AP6275P Wi-Fi device
On 29/07/2024 09:00, Jacobe Zang wrote:
> Add clocks and clock-names for brcm4329-fmac.
Why? Which devices have it? If only your newest addon, then squash the
patches and add appropriate allOf:if:then disallowing the clocks for
others. Or maybe all of them have it? Why commit msg does not explain
anything about the hardware?
>
> Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>
> ---
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists