[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240730163730.GC1967603@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:37:30 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
David Jander <david.jander@...tonic.nl>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH can-next 11/21] can: rockchip_canfd: add functions to
check if CAN-FD frames are equal
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Add a pair new functions to check if 2 struct canfd_frame are equal.
> The 1st checks if the header of the CAN frames are equal, the 2nd
> checks if the data portion are equal:
>
> - rkcanfd_can_frame_header_equal()
> - rkcanfd_can_frame_data_equal()
>
> This functionality is needed in the next patch.
nit: I would squash this into the next patch as
rkcanfd_can_frame_header_equal() is defined but
unused in this patch, which is flagged by
allmodconfig W=1 builds.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists