lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4213b756-a92f-4be9-951d-893f4a6590b4@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 13:17:30 +0200
From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: jaka@...ux.ibm.com, tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com,
        weiyongjun1@...wei.com, yuehaibing@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: add the max value of fallback reason
 count



On 02.08.24 04:38, D. Wythe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/1/24 7:35 PM, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
>> The number of fallback reasons defined in the smc_clc.h file has reached
>> 36. For historical reasons, some are no longer quoted, and there's 33
>> actually in use. So, add the max value of fallback reason count to 50.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   net/smc/smc_stats.h | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_stats.h b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>> index 9d32058db2b5..ab5aafc6f44c 100644
>> --- a/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>> +++ b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>   #include "smc_clc.h"
>> -#define SMC_MAX_FBACK_RSN_CNT 30
>> +#define SMC_MAX_FBACK_RSN_CNT 50
> It feels more like a fix ?
> 
>>   enum {
>>       SMC_BUF_8K,
> 

Hi Zhengchao,

IMO It should be 36 instead of 50 because of unnecessary smc_stats_fback 
element and  unnecessary scanning e.g. in smc_stat_inc_fback_rsn_cnt(). 
If there is any new reason code coming later, the one who are 
introducing the new reason code should update the the value correspondingly.
Btw, I also it is a bug fix other than feature.

Thanks,
Wenjia

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ