lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2h6c26w7o.fsf@ja-home.int.chopps.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 00:55:46 -0400
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@...pps.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@...pps.org>, devel@...ux-ipsec.org, Steffen
 Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Christian
 Hopps <chopps@...n.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v7 08/16] xfrm: iptfs: add user packet
 (tunnel ingress) handling


Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> writes:

> Christian Hopps <chopps@...pps.org> wrote:
>> +static void iptfs_output_queued(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff_head *list)
>> +{
>> +	struct xfrm_iptfs_data *xtfs = x->mode_data;
>> +	struct sk_buff *skb, *skb2, **nextp;
>> +	struct skb_shared_info *shi;
>> +
> [..]
>> +			if (skb->dev)
>> +				XFRM_INC_STATS(dev_net(skb->dev),
>> +					       LINUX_MIB_XFRMOUTERROR);
>
> Nit:
> Here and in several places you are using dev_net() helper.
>
> I think that if xfrm_state is available, then xs_net(x) makes more sense.
>
> It also avoids the skb->dev conditional.

Ok, replaced where xfrm_state was available.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ