lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202408030834.THon2krt-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 08:38:01 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@...pps.org>, devel@...ux-ipsec.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Christian Hopps <chopps@...pps.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v7 12/16] xfrm: iptfs: handle received
 fragmented inner packets

Hi Christian,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on klassert-ipsec-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on netfilter-nf/main linus/master v6.11-rc1 next-20240802]
[cannot apply to klassert-ipsec/master nf-next/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Hopps/xfrm-config-add-CONFIG_XFRM_IPTFS/20240802-185628
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801080314.169715-13-chopps%40chopps.org
patch subject: [PATCH ipsec-next v7 12/16] xfrm: iptfs: handle received fragmented inner packets
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240803/202408030834.THon2krt-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240803/202408030834.THon2krt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408030834.THon2krt-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:37: warning: expecting prototype for IP(). Prototype was for IPTFS_DEFAULT_DROP_TIME_USECS() instead
   net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:49: warning: bad line: 
   net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:58: warning: expecting prototype for IP(). Prototype was for IPTFS_DEFAULT_INIT_DELAY_USECS() instead


vim +37 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c

    26	
    27	/**
    28	 * IP-TFS default SA values (tunnel egress/dir-in)
    29	 *
    30	 * IPTFS_DEFAULT_DROP_TIME_USECS
    31	 *        The default IPTFS drop time in microseconds. The drop time is the amount
    32	 *        of time before a missing out-of-order IPTFS tunnel packet is considered
    33	 *        lost. See also the reorder window.
    34	 *
    35	 *        Default 1s (1000000).
    36	 */
  > 37	#define IPTFS_DEFAULT_DROP_TIME_USECS	(1000000000ull) /* 1s */
    38	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ