[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrOdthE36RQy78fx@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 18:15:50 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@...hat.com>
To: christopher.s.hall@...el.com
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, david.zage@...el.com,
vinicius.gomes@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>,
rodrigo.cadore@...coustics.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 1/5] igc: Ensure the PTM
cycle is reliably triggered
Hi Christopher,
On Aug 6 17:30, christopher.s.hall@...el.com wrote:
> From: Christopher S M Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>
>
> Writing to clear the PTM status 'valid' bit while the PTM cycle is
> triggered results in unreliable PTM operation. To fix this, clear the
> PTM 'trigger' and status after each PTM transaction.
>
> The issue can be reproduced with the following:
>
> $ sudo phc2sys -R 1000 -O 0 -i tsn0 -m
>
> Note: 1000 Hz (-R 1000) is unrealistically large, but provides a way to
> quickly reproduce the issue.
>
> PHC2SYS exits with:
>
> "ioctl PTP_OFFSET_PRECISE: Connection timed out" when the PTM transaction
> fails
It would be great to add the problems encountered with kdump to the
commit message as well, as discussed with Vinicius, wouldn't it?
If you need a description, I can provide one.
Thanks,
Corinna
Powered by blists - more mailing lists