netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: phy: microchip_t1s: add support for Microchip's LAN867X Rev.C1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240816165541.GB632411@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:55:41 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, ramon.nordin.rodriguez@...roamp.se,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: phy: microchip_t1s: add support for
 Microchip's LAN867X Rev.C1

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 01:21:02PM +0000, Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com wrote:
> On 15/08/24 8:12 pm, Simon Horman wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 07:18:14PM +0530, Parthiban Veerasooran wrote:
> >> This patch adds support for LAN8670/1/2 Rev.C1 as per the latest
> >> configuration note AN1699 released (Revision E (DS60001699F - June 2024))
> >> https://www.microchip.com/en-us/application-notes/an1699
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/phy/Kconfig         |  2 +-
> >>   drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1s.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>   2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> >> index 68db15d52355..63b45544c191 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> >> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ config MICREL_PHY
> >>   config MICROCHIP_T1S_PHY
> >>        tristate "Microchip 10BASE-T1S Ethernet PHYs"
> >>        help
> >> -       Currently supports the LAN8670/1/2 Rev.B1 and LAN8650/1 Rev.B0/B1
> >> +       Currently supports the LAN8670/1/2 Rev.B1/C1 and LAN8650/1 Rev.B0/B1
> >>          Internal PHYs.
> >>
> >>   config MICROCHIP_PHY
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1s.c b/drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1s.c
> >> index d0af02a25d01..62f5ce548c6a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1s.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1s.c
> >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> >>    * Driver for Microchip 10BASE-T1S PHYs
> >>    *
> >>    * Support: Microchip Phys:
> >> - *  lan8670/1/2 Rev.B1
> >> + *  lan8670/1/2 Rev.B1/C1
> >>    *  lan8650/1 Rev.B0/B1 Internal PHYs
> >>    */
> >>
> >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >>   #include <linux/phy.h>
> >>
> >>   #define PHY_ID_LAN867X_REVB1 0x0007C162
> >> +#define PHY_ID_LAN867X_REVC1 0x0007C164
> >>   /* Both Rev.B0 and B1 clause 22 PHYID's are same due to B1 chip limitation */
> >>   #define PHY_ID_LAN865X_REVB 0x0007C1B3
> >>
> >> @@ -243,7 +244,7 @@ static int lan865x_revb_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> >>                if (ret)
> >>                        return ret;
> >>
> >> -             if (i == 2) {
> >> +             if (i == 1) {
> >>                        ret = lan865x_setup_cfgparam(phydev, offsets);
> >>                        if (ret)
> >>                                return ret;
> > 
> > Hi Parthiban,
> > 
> > This patch is addressing LAN867X Rev.C1 support.
> > But the hunk above appears to update LAN865X Rev.B0/B1 support.
> > Is that intentional?
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> Sorry, there is a mistake here. It is supposed to be "i == 1" only, but 
> it should have been in the below patch onwards,
> 
> "[PATCH net-next 2/7] net: phy: microchip_t1s: update new initial 
> settings for LAN865X Rev.B0"
> 
> Thanks for pointing it out. Will correct it in the next version.

Thanks,

Other than the minor problem noted above, the patchset looked good to me.