[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240816.053009.1420518753499945384.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 05:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
To: andrew@...n.ch
Cc: fujita.tomonori@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu,
miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me,
aliceryhl@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] rust: net::phy unified
genphy_read_status function for C22 and C45 registers
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:19:51 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>> +///
>> +/// // Checks the link status and updates current link state via C22.
>> +/// dev.genphy_read_status::<phy::C22>();
>> +/// // Checks the link status and updates current link state via C45.
>> +/// dev.genphy_read_status::<phy::C45>();
>
> Again, the word `via` is wrong here. You are looking at the link state
> as reported by registers in the C22 namespace, or the C45 namespace.
Yeah, how about the followings?
/// // Checks the link status as reported by registers in the C22 namespace
/// // and updates current link state.
/// dev.genphy_read_status::<phy::C22>();
/// // Checks the link status as reported by registers in the C45 namespace
/// // and updates current link state.
/// dev.genphy_read_status::<phy::C45>();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists