netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8895/KSZ8864 switch support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <BYAPR11MB3558BF270DDBDEFE67178206EC8F2@BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 23:30:59 +0000
From: <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>
To: <vtpieter@...il.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<f.fainelli@...il.com>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <marex@...x.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, <olteanv@...il.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
	<Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8895/KSZ8864
 switch support

> Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8895/KSZ8864 switch
> support
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content
> is safe
> 
> Hi Tristram,
> 
> > @@ -325,7 +327,7 @@ void ksz8_r_mib_pkt(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, u16
> addr,
> >
> >  void ksz8_freeze_mib(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, bool freeze)
> >  {
> > -     if (ksz_is_ksz88x3(dev))
> > +     if (ksz_is_ksz88x3(dev) || ksz_is_8895_family(dev))
> 
> Small comment, would it not be more clear and consistent to introduce
> a new ksz_is_ksz88xx function in ksz_common.h, being ksz_is_ksz88x3 ||
> ksz_is_8895_family?
> 
> That would help with the renamed ksz88x3_dev_ops that you will
> encounter when rebasing. In fact, seeing your additions here, I would
> propose to rename this struct to ksz88xx_dev_ops.

Will update and re-submit patches after testing with new code.