[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZszNJBRScwD6pXPB@tissot.1015granger.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:44:52 -0400
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: A K M Fazla Mehrab <a.mehrab@...edance.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-tls-handshake@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net/handshake: use sockfd_put() helper
Hi-
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:26:52PM +0000, A K M Fazla Mehrab wrote:
> Replace fput() with sockfd_put() in handshake_nl_done_doit().
The patch description needs to explain why. Lacking any other
context, I assume this is a clean-up for consistency with other
sockfd_lookup() call sites and that no behavior change is expected.
Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: A K M Fazla Mehrab <a.mehrab@...edance.com>
> ---
> net/handshake/netlink.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/handshake/netlink.c b/net/handshake/netlink.c
> index 89637e732866..7e46d130dce2 100644
> --- a/net/handshake/netlink.c
> +++ b/net/handshake/netlink.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ int handshake_nl_done_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> if (!req) {
> err = -EBUSY;
> trace_handshake_cmd_done_err(net, req, sock->sk, err);
> - fput(sock->file);
> + sockfd_put(sock);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ int handshake_nl_done_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> status = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[HANDSHAKE_A_DONE_STATUS]);
>
> handshake_complete(req, status, info);
> - fput(sock->file);
> + sockfd_put(sock);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists