lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19b708fa-b0e0-4124-8f3b-51a9f50eb2a9@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:54:09 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
	linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	o.rempel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next] net: ag71xx: get reset control using devm api

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 12:26:30PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 9:59 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:18:56 -0700 Rosen Penev wrote:
> > > -     struct reset_control *mdio_reset;
> > >       struct clk *clk_mdio;
> > >  };
> >
> > If you send multiple patches which depend on each other they must be
> > part of one series. I'll apply the clk_eth patch shortly but you gotta
> > resend this one, our CI couldn't apply and test it.
> Isn't the CI x86 only?

The CI also does more than X86 builds. It checks if you have Cc: all
the needed maintainer, is the patch checkpatch clean, if it is for
stable, have you Cc: stable etc. We want all these things which are
architecture independent to run, but they failed at the very first
step, applying the patch.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ