[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58fe658a-ab77-40fb-b24c-59c5cf2645d6@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 15:15:49 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, shenjian15@...wei.com,
wangpeiyang1@...wei.com, liuyonglong@...wei.com,
chenhao418@...wei.com, sudongming1@...wei.com,
xujunsheng@...wei.com, shiyongbang@...wei.com, libaihan@...wei.com,
jdamato@...tly.com, horms@...nel.org, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, salil.mehta@...wei.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 net-next 03/11] net: hibmcge: Add mdio and hardware
configuration supported in this module
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 08:13:58PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:
>
> on 2024/9/3 19:59, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > On 8/30/24 14:15, Jijie Shao wrote:
> > [...]
> > > +static int hbg_mdio_wait_ready(struct hbg_mac *mac)
> > > +{
> > > +#define HBG_MDIO_OP_TIMEOUT_US (1 * 1000 * 1000)
> > > +#define HBG_MDIO_OP_INTERVAL_US (5 * 1000)
> >
> > Minor nit: I find the define inside the function body less readable than
> > placing them just before the function itself.
>
> These two macros are only used in this function.
> Is it necessary to move them to the header file?
Put them at the top of the .c file. That is pretty much standard in C.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists