[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e25187c-ce88-4415-91ee-4c636964b674@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 20:57:34 +0800
From: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <shaojijie@...wei.com>, <shenjian15@...wei.com>,
<wangpeiyang1@...wei.com>, <liuyonglong@...wei.com>, <chenhao418@...wei.com>,
<sudongming1@...wei.com>, <xujunsheng@...wei.com>, <shiyongbang@...wei.com>,
<libaihan@...wei.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <jdamato@...tly.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 net-next 07/11] net: hibmcge: Implement rx_poll
function to receive packets
on 2024/9/3 20:08, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 8/30/24 14:16, Jijie Shao wrote:
>> @@ -119,6 +122,20 @@ static void hbg_buffer_free_skb(struct
>> hbg_buffer *buffer)
>> buffer->skb = NULL;
>> }
>> +static int hbg_buffer_alloc_skb(struct hbg_buffer *buffer)
>> +{
>> + u32 len = hbg_spec_max_frame_len(buffer->priv, buffer->dir);
>> + struct hbg_priv *priv = buffer->priv;
>> +
>> + buffer->skb = netdev_alloc_skb(priv->netdev, len);
>> + if (unlikely(!buffer->skb))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> It's preferable to allocate the skbuff at packet reception time,
> inside the poll() function, just before passing the skb to the upper
> stack, so that the header contents are fresh in the cache.
> Additionally that increases the change for the allocator could hit its
> fastpath.
In hibmcge driver, we alloc the skb memory first, after dma, and then set the dam address to the MAC for receiving packets.
After receiving a packet, MAC fills the hw rx descriptor and packet content to skb->data, and then reports an RX interrupt to trigger the driver to receive the packet.
In poll(), we use skb_reserve() to adjust the size of the SKB headroom. The skb->data is moved backward by the descriptor length(HBG_PACKET_HEAD_SIZE) to ensure
the skb->data is at the start position of the packet.
┌─────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┐
│hw rx descriptor │ packet │
│ │ │
└─────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────┘
^
skb->data
>
>> +
>> + buffer->skb_len = len;
>> + memset(buffer->skb->data, 0, HBG_PACKET_HEAD_SIZE);
>
> Out of sheer ignorace, why do you need to clear the packet data?
>
>
The length of HBG_PACKET_HEAD_SIZE is exactly the size of the rx descriptor. Therefore, we want to clear before receiving packets to ensure that the descriptor is correct.
Thanks
Jijie Shao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists