netdev - Re: [PATCH -next 2/4] tun: Make use of str_disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9d844c72-bda6-4e28-b48c-63c4f8855ae7@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:25:53 +0800
From: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Andy Shevchenko
	<andy@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <kees@...nel.org>, <jasowang@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/4] tun: Make use of str_disabled_enabled helper



On 2024/9/2 22:30, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 01:07:41PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 17:58:38 +0800 Hongbo Li wrote:
>>>> Use str_disabled_enabled() helper instead of open
>>>> coding the same.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>>   		netif_info(tun, drv, tun->dev, "ignored: set checksum %s\n",
>>>> -			   arg ? "disabled" : "enabled");
>>>> +			   str_disabled_enabled(arg));
>>>
>>> You don't explain the 'why'. How is this an improvement?
>>> nack on this and 2 similar networking changes you sent
>>
>> Side opinion: This makes the messages more unified and not prone to typos
>> and/or grammatical mistakes. Unification allows to shrink binary due to
>> linker efforts on string literals deduplication.
> 
> This adds a layer of indirection.
> 
> The original code is immediately obvious. When I see the new code I
> have to take a detour through cscope to figure out what it does.
If they have used it once, there is no need for more jumps, because it's 
relatively simple.

Using a dedicated function seems very elegant and unified, especially 
for some string printing situations, such as disable/enable. Even in 
today's kernel tree, there are several different formats that appear: 
'enable/disable', 'enabled/disabled', 'en/dis'.

Thanks,
Hongbo

> 
> To me, in this case, the benefit is too marginal to justify that.