[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240904110726.GT4792@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 12:07:26 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, thepacketgeek@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...emonkey.org.uk,
thevlad@...a.com, max@...sevol.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/9] net: netconsole: track explicitly if
msgbody was written to buffer
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 07:07:49AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> The current check to determine if the message body was fully sent is
> difficult to follow. To improve clarity, introduce a variable that
> explicitly tracks whether the message body (msgbody) has been completely
> sent, indicating when it's time to begin sending userdata.
>
> Additionally, add comments to make the code more understandable for
> others who may work with it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Thanks,
The nit below notwithstanding this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/netconsole.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> index 22ccd9aa016a..c8a23a7684e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> @@ -1102,6 +1102,7 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> */
> while (offset < body_len) {
> int this_header = header_len;
> + bool msgbody_written = false;
> int this_offset = 0;
> int this_chunk = 0;
>
> @@ -1119,12 +1120,22 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> memcpy(buf + this_header, msgbody + offset, this_chunk);
> this_offset += this_chunk;
> }
> +
> + if (offset + this_offset >= msgbody_len)
> + /* msgbody was finally written, either in the previous messages
> + * and/or in the current buf. Time to write the userdata.
> + */
Please consider keeping comments <= 80 columns wide.
Likewise in other patches of this series.
checkpatch can be run with an option to check for this.
> + msgbody_written = true;
> +
> /* Msg body is fully written and there is pending userdata to write,
> * append userdata in this chunk
> */
> - if (offset + this_offset >= msgbody_len &&
> - offset + this_offset < body_len) {
> + if (msgbody_written && offset + this_offset < body_len) {
> + /* Track how much user data was already sent. First time here, sent_userdata
> + * is zero
> + */
> int sent_userdata = (offset + this_offset) - msgbody_len;
> + /* offset of bytes used in current buf */
> int preceding_bytes = this_chunk + this_header;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sent_userdata < 0))
> --
> 2.43.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists