[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28a20a6697dbe610bd13829baa9d188ef22a1742.camel@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 18:13:21 +0200
From: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Alibek Omarov <a1ba.omarov@...il.com>, Heiko
Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 16/20] can: rockchip_canfd: prepare to use full
TX-FIFO depth
> The workaround for the chips that are affected by erratum 6, i.e. EFF
> frames may be send as standard frames, is to re-send the EFF frame.
> This means the driver cannot queue the next frame for sending, as long
> ad the EFF frame has not been successfully send out.
just a nitpick, shouldn't it be "as" instead of "ad" ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists