netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 16/20] can: rockchip_canfd: prepare to use full TX-FIFO depth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240905-funky-unbiased-oxpecker-eae021-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:35:46 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, 
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de, Alibek Omarov <a1ba.omarov@...il.com>, 
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 16/20] can: rockchip_canfd: prepare to use full
 TX-FIFO depth

On 04.09.2024 18:13:21, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> > The workaround for the chips that are affected by erratum 6, i.e. EFF
> > frames may be send as standard frames, is to re-send the EFF frame.
> > This means the driver cannot queue the next frame for sending, as long
> > ad the EFF frame has not been successfully send out.
> 
> just a nitpick, shouldn't it be "as" instead of "ad" ?

Fixed. But I will not send another PR unless there is another problem :)

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)