[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240905071738.3725-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:17:37 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
dsahern@...nel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
shuah@...nel.org,
willemb@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] rxtimestamp.c: add the test for SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Test when we use SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER with software
or hardware report flag. The expected result is no rx timestamp
report.
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c
index 9eb42570294d..9760abdb6e05 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ static struct sof_flag sof_flags[] = {
SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE),
SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE),
SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE),
+ SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER),
};
static struct socket_type socket_types[] = {
@@ -97,6 +98,16 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
| SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE },
{}
},
+ {
+ { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE
+ | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER },
+ {}
+ },
+ {
+ { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
+ | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER },
+ {}
+ },
{
{ .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
| SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE },
--
2.37.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists