netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] rxtimestamp.c: add the test for SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL+tcoBQLSeYfK-5F3wFDPNHOkLOGfn=fZiqgCmTLH37frd2aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 18:31:51 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, 
	shuah@...nel.org, willemb@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] rxtimestamp.c: add the test for SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:18 PM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
>
> Test when we use SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER with software
> or hardware report flag. The expected result is no rx timestamp
> report.
>
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c
> index 9eb42570294d..9760abdb6e05 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ static struct sof_flag sof_flags[] = {
>         SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE),
>         SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE),
>         SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE),
> +       SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER),

Ah.. I missed adding SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE :S

I'll repost it in 24 hour.

>  };
>
>  static struct socket_type socket_types[] = {
> @@ -97,6 +98,16 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
>                         | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE },
>                 {}
>         },
> +       {
> +               { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE
> +                       | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER },
> +               {}
> +       },
> +       {
> +               { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
> +                       | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER },
> +               {}
> +       },
>         {
>                 { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
>                         | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE },
> --
> 2.37.3
>