[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240905143128.0dde754f@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 14:31:28 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, ncardwell@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, fw@...len.de, Willem de Bruijn
<willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests/net: integrate packetdrill with
ksft
On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 23:07:03 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/config
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG=y
Looks like this is not enough:
# 1..2
# open tun device: No such file or directory
# not ok 1 ipv4
# open tun device: No such file or directory
https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-packetdrill/results/759141/1-tcp-inq-client-pkt/stdout
Resulting config in the build:
# CONFIG_TUN is not set
https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-packetdrill/results/759141/config
Keep in mind the "Important" note here:
https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/wiki/How-to-run-netdev-selftests-CI-style#how-to-build
I recommend using a fresh tree or mrproper for testing vng configs.
Feel free to post v2 without the 24h wait, it's a bit tricky to handle
new targets in CI, sooner we merge this the less manual work for me..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists