[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66da3dabc3f71_25102d29476@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 19:24:27 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com,
ncardwell@...gle.com,
shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
fw@...len.de,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests/net: integrate packetdrill with
ksft
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 23:07:03 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/config
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG=y
>
> Looks like this is not enough:
>
> # 1..2
> # open tun device: No such file or directory
> # not ok 1 ipv4
> # open tun device: No such file or directory
>
> https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-packetdrill/results/759141/1-tcp-inq-client-pkt/stdout
>
> Resulting config in the build:
>
> # CONFIG_TUN is not set
>
> https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-packetdrill/results/759141/config
>
> Keep in mind the "Important" note here:
>
> https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/wiki/How-to-run-netdev-selftests-CI-style#how-to-build
>
> I recommend using a fresh tree or mrproper for testing vng configs.
>
> Feel free to post v2 without the 24h wait, it's a bit tricky to handle
> new targets in CI, sooner we merge this the less manual work for me..
Oops sorry. Thanks for the pointer.
Sent a v2 with CONFIG_TUN and a few other CONFIGS from reviewing
the existing configs and defaults.sh. The above steps work for me now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists