[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240910083410.GE525413@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:34:10 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, gospo@...adcom.com,
selvin.xavier@...adcom.com, pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com,
Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] bnxt_en: Add MSIX check in
bnxt_check_rings()
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 01:27:36PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> bnxt_check_rings() is called to ensure that we have the hardware ring
> resources before committing to reinitialize with the new number of
> rings. MSIX vectors are never checked at this point, because up
> until recently we must first disable MSIX before we can allocate the
> new set of MSIX vectors.
>
> Now that we support dynamic MSIX allocation, check to make sure we
> can dynamically allocate the new MSIX vectors as the last step in
> bnxt_check_rings() if dynamic MSIX is supported.
>
> For example, the IOMMU group may limit the number of MSIX vectors
> for the device. With this patch, the ring change will fail more
> gracefully when there is not enough MSIX vectors.
>
> It is also better to move bnxt_check_rings() to be called as the last
> step when changing ethtool rings.
>
> Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists