[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240910071649.4fba988f@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 07:16:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, joshua.a.hay@...el.com,
michal.kubiak@...el.com, nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com,
willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6][pull request] idpf: XDP chapter II:
convert Tx completion to libeth
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 13:53:15 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> Alexander Lobakin says:
>
> XDP for idpf is currently 5 chapters:
> * convert Rx to libeth;
> * convert Tx completion to libeth (this);
> * generic XDP and XSk code changes;
> * actual XDP for idpf via libeth_xdp;
> * XSk for idpf (^).
>
> Part II does the following:
> * adds generic libeth Tx completion routines;
> * converts idpf to use generic libeth Tx comp routines;
> * fixes Tx queue timeouts and robustifies Tx completion in general;
> * fixes Tx event/descriptor flushes (writebacks).
You're posting two series at once, again. I was going to merge the
subfunction series yesterday, but since you don't wait why would
I bother trying to merge your code quickly. And this morning I got
chased by Thorsten about Intel regressions, again:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219143
Do you have anything else queued up?
I'm really tempted to ask you to not post anything else for net-next
this week.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists