netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6][pull request] idpf: XDP chapter II: convert Tx completion to libeth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c3ba53a1-0de6-7c15-8a74-415e91e55edc@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:46:57 -0700
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, <joshua.a.hay@...el.com>,
	<michal.kubiak@...el.com>, <nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com>,
	<willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6][pull request] idpf: XDP chapter II:
 convert Tx completion to libeth



On 9/10/2024 7:16 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon,  9 Sep 2024 13:53:15 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
>> Alexander Lobakin says:
>>
>> XDP for idpf is currently 5 chapters:
>> * convert Rx to libeth;
>> * convert Tx completion to libeth (this);
>> * generic XDP and XSk code changes;
>> * actual XDP for idpf via libeth_xdp;
>> * XSk for idpf (^).
>>
>> Part II does the following:
>> * adds generic libeth Tx completion routines;
>> * converts idpf to use generic libeth Tx comp routines;
>> * fixes Tx queue timeouts and robustifies Tx completion in general;
>> * fixes Tx event/descriptor flushes (writebacks).
> 
> You're posting two series at once, again. I was going to merge the
> subfunction series yesterday, but since you don't wait why would
> I bother trying to merge your code quickly.

I thought last month's vacations were over as I had seen Eric and Paolo 
on the list and that things were returning to normal.

> And this morning I got
> chased by Thorsten about Intel regressions, again:
>   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219143

Our client team, who works on that driver, was working on that issue. I 
will check in with them.

> Do you have anything else queued up?
> I'm really tempted to ask you to not post anything else for net-next
> this week.

I do have more patches that need to be sent, but it's more than can fit 
in the time that's left. There are 1 or 2 more that I was hoping to get 
in before net-next closed or Plumbers starts.

Thanks,
Tony