[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240910162517.2b226a71@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:25:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
syzbot+3d602af7549af539274e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: hsr: Use the seqnr lock for frames
received via interlink port.
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 11:49:48 +0200 Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > + if (port->type == HSR_PT_INTERLINK) {
> > + spin_lock_bh(&hsr->seqnr_lock);
>
> I'm just wondering if this could have impact on offloaded HSR operation.
>
> I will try to run hsr_redbox.sh test on this patch (with QEMU) and
> share results.
Hi Lukasz, any luck with the testing?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists