netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: dsa: RCU-protect dsa_ptr in struct net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240910191945.717ea514@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:19:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "A. Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ar1nç ÜNAL
 <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>, Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, DENG
 Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Andrew
 Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir
 Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Matthias
 Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
 <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Claudiu Manoil
 <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Alexandre Belloni
 <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Broadcom
 internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
 Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Mark
 Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Nikolay
 Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 bridge@...ts.linux.dev, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: dsa: RCU-protect dsa_ptr in struct net_device

On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:03:14 +0200 A. Sverdlin wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] net: dsa: RCU-protect dsa_ptr in struct net_device

When you repost please use --subject-prefix="PATCH net v2" 
in git format-patch. The "net" part, specifically, is important,
the patch doesn't apply to net-next so we need to give our bots
a bit of a hint as to which tree this should be (build) tested 
against.
-- 
pw-bot: cr