[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87jzffq9ge.fsf@mail.lhotse>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:02:09 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<hawk@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Linux
Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@...db.de>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] page_pool: fix build on powerpc with GCC 14
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com> writes:
> Building net-next with powerpc with GCC 14 compiler results in this
> build error:
>
> /home/sfr/next/tmp/ccuSzwiR.s: Assembler messages:
> /home/sfr/next/tmp/ccuSzwiR.s:2579: Error: operand out of domain (39 is
> not a multiple of 4)
> make[5]: *** [/home/sfr/next/next/scripts/Makefile.build:229:
> net/core/page_pool.o] Error 1
>
> Root caused in this thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/913e2fbd-d318-4c9b-aed2-4d333a1d5cf0@cs-soprasteria.com/
Sorry I'm late to this, the original report wasn't Cc'ed to linuxppc-dev :D
I think this is a bug in the arch/powerpc inline asm constraints.
Can you try the patch below, it fixes the build error for me.
I'll run it through some boot tests and turn it into a proper patch over
the weekend.
cheers
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
index 5bf6a4d49268..0e41c1da82dd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -23,6 +23,12 @@
#define __atomic_release_fence() \
__asm__ __volatile__(PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory")
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+#define DS_FORM_CONSTRAINT "Z<>"
+#else
+#define DS_FORM_CONSTRAINT "YZ<>"
+#endif
+
static __inline__ int arch_atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
{
int t;
@@ -197,7 +203,7 @@ static __inline__ s64 arch_atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_KERNEL_PREFIXED))
__asm__ __volatile__("ld %0,0(%1)" : "=r"(t) : "b"(&v->counter));
else
- __asm__ __volatile__("ld%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : "m<>"(v->counter));
+ __asm__ __volatile__("ld%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : DS_FORM_CONSTRAINT (v->counter));
return t;
}
@@ -208,7 +214,7 @@ static __inline__ void arch_atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, s64 i)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_KERNEL_PREFIXED))
__asm__ __volatile__("std %1,0(%2)" : "=m"(v->counter) : "r"(i), "b"(&v->counter));
else
- __asm__ __volatile__("std%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=m<>"(v->counter) : "r"(i));
+ __asm__ __volatile__("std%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=" DS_FORM_CONSTRAINT (v->counter) : "r"(i));
}
#define ATOMIC64_OP(op, asm_op) \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists