[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ca9a20c-59a9-4b95-bfe1-5729e2361d70@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 01:57:35 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, horms@...nel.org,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...el.com>,
Chuah Kim Tatt <kim.tatt.chuah@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: stmmac: dwmac4: extend timeout for VLAN Tag
register busy bit check
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 02:34:52PM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> Increase the timeout for checking the busy bit of the VLAN Tag register
> from 10µs to 500ms. This change is necessary to accommodate scenarios
> where Energy Efficient Ethernet (EEE) is enabled.
>
> Overnight testing revealed that when EEE is active, the busy bit can
> remain set for up to approximately 300ms. The new 500ms timeout provides
> a safety margin.
Do you know what EEE has to do with VLAN filtering?
Could there be other registers which suffer from the same problem?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists