[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB9185737222043AD4AE672D6B896F2@PAXPR04MB9185.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:18:00 +0000
From: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Ong Boon
Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>, Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...el.com>,
Chuah Kim Tatt <kim.tatt.chuah@...el.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev"
<imx@...ts.linux.dev>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: stmmac: dwmac4: extend timeout for VLAN Tag
register busy bit check
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2024 5:18 PM
> To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>;
> horms@...nel.org; Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>; Jose
> Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>; Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>;
> Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...el.com>; Chuah Kim Tatt
> <kim.tatt.chuah@...el.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-stm32@...md-
> mailman.stormreply.com; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> imx@...ts.linux.dev; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: stmmac: dwmac4: extend timeout for
> VLAN Tag register busy bit check
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
> > - val = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_VLAN_TAG);
> > - if (!(val & GMAC_VLAN_TAG_CTRL_OB))
> > - return 0;
> > - udelay(1);
> > - }
>
> > + ret = readl_poll_timeout(ioaddr + GMAC_VLAN_TAG, val,
> > + !(val & GMAC_VLAN_TAG_CTRL_OB),
> > + 1000, timeout);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + return 0;
> >
> > netdev_err(dev, "Timeout accessing MAC_VLAN_Tag_Filter\n");
>
> 1. Just drop the timeout local variable and use the 500000 literal directly. There is
> no point in such parametrization especially you have already added the delay as
> is.
>
> 2. A more traditional, readable and maintainable pattern is the error-check
> statement after the call. So seeing you are changing this part of the method
> anyway, let's convert it to:
>
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(ioaddr + GMAC_VLAN_TAG, val,
> + !(val & GMAC_VLAN_TAG_CTRL_OB),
> + 1000, timeout);
> + if (ret) {
> + netdev_err(dev, "Timeout accessing MAC_VLAN_Tag_Filter\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
>
Hi Serge,
Good suggestions! Will send out a new version.
Thanks,
Shenwei
> -Serge(y)
>
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists