[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yzyezokrtcj5pnby4ak5lzrrnqu3y3k45kaibtklwrjn4ivzel@hwf6bgssykna>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:17:49 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, horms@...nel.org,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>, Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...el.com>,
Chuah Kim Tatt <kim.tatt.chuah@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: stmmac: dwmac4: extend timeout for VLAN Tag
register busy bit check
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 02:34:52PM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> Increase the timeout for checking the busy bit of the VLAN Tag register
> from 10µs to 500ms. This change is necessary to accommodate scenarios
> where Energy Efficient Ethernet (EEE) is enabled.
>
> Overnight testing revealed that when EEE is active, the busy bit can
> remain set for up to approximately 300ms. The new 500ms timeout provides
> a safety margin.
>
> Fixes: ed64639bc1e0 ("net: stmmac: Add support for VLAN Rx filtering")
> Signed-off-by: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - replace the udelay with readl_poll_timeout per Simon's review.
>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
> index a1858f083eef..a0cfa2eaebb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include "stmmac.h"
> #include "stmmac_pcs.h"
> #include "dwmac4.h"
> @@ -471,7 +472,7 @@ static int dwmac4_write_vlan_filter(struct net_device *dev,
> u8 index, u32 data)
> {
> void __iomem *ioaddr = (void __iomem *)dev->base_addr;
> - int i, timeout = 10;
> + int ret, timeout = 500000; //500ms
> u32 val;
>
> if (index >= hw->num_vlan)
> @@ -487,12 +488,11 @@ static int dwmac4_write_vlan_filter(struct net_device *dev,
>
> writel(val, ioaddr + GMAC_VLAN_TAG);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
> - val = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_VLAN_TAG);
> - if (!(val & GMAC_VLAN_TAG_CTRL_OB))
> - return 0;
> - udelay(1);
> - }
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(ioaddr + GMAC_VLAN_TAG, val,
> + !(val & GMAC_VLAN_TAG_CTRL_OB),
> + 1000, timeout);
> + if (!ret)
> + return 0;
>
> netdev_err(dev, "Timeout accessing MAC_VLAN_Tag_Filter\n");
1. Just drop the timeout local variable and use the 500000 literal
directly. There is no point in such parametrization especially you
have already added the delay as is.
2. A more traditional, readable and maintainable pattern is the
error-check statement after the call. So seeing you are changing this
part of the method anyway, let's convert it to:
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout(ioaddr + GMAC_VLAN_TAG, val,
+ !(val & GMAC_VLAN_TAG_CTRL_OB),
+ 1000, timeout);
+ if (ret) {
+ netdev_err(dev, "Timeout accessing MAC_VLAN_Tag_Filter\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
-Serge(y)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists