[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+yDakwWW0t0ESrV4XJYjeutvtSdHj1gEJdxBS8qMEQBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 20:55:16 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Jonathan Davies <jonathan.davies@...anix.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: add more sanity checks to qdisc_pkt_len_init()
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:24 PM Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com> wrote:
>
>
> > git log --oneline --grep "sanity check" | wc -l
> > 3397
>
> I don't know what this means. We've done it in the past and so
> should continue to do it in the future? OK.
This means that if they are in the changelogs, they can not be removed.
This is immutable stuff.
Should we zap git history because of some 'bad words' that most
authors/committers/reviewers were not even aware of?
I would understand for stuff visible in the code (comments, error messages),
but the changelogs are there and can not be changed.
Who knows, maybe in 10 years 'Malicious packet.' will be very offensive,
then we can remove/change the _comment_ I added in this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists