[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB5911E8D0AC68974B9B41CAEABA692@MW4PR11MB5911.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 20:22:53 +0000
From: "Singh, Krishneil K" <krishneil.k.singh@...el.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, "Zaki, Ahmed" <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
CC: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Linga, Pavan Kumar"
<pavan.kumar.linga@...el.com>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: fix VF dynamic interrupt ctl register
initialization
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 2, 2024 1:49 AM
> To: Zaki, Ahmed <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Linga, Pavan
> Kumar <pavan.kumar.linga@...el.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: fix VF dynamic interrupt ctl register
> initialization
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 04:38:25PM -0600, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
> > The VF's dynamic interrupt ctl "dyn_ctl_intrvl_s" is not initialized
> > in idpf_vf_intr_reg_init(). This resulted in the following UBSAN error
> > whenever a VF is created:
> >
> > [ 564.345655] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c:3654:10
> > [ 564.345663] shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
> > [ 564.345671] CPU: 33 UID: 0 PID: 2458 Comm: NetworkManager Not tainted
> 6.11.0-rc4+ #1
> > [ 564.345678] Hardware name: Intel Corporation
> M50CYP2SBSTD/M50CYP2SBSTD, BIOS SE5C6200.86B.0027.P10.2201070222
> 01/07/2022
> > [ 564.345683] Call Trace:
> > [ 564.345688] <TASK>
> > [ 564.345693] dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xb0
> > [ 564.345708] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x16b/0x320
> > [ 564.345730] idpf_vport_intr_update_itr_ena_irq.cold+0x13/0x39 [idpf]
> > [ 564.345755] ? __pfx_idpf_vport_intr_update_itr_ena_irq+0x10/0x10 [idpf]
> > [ 564.345771] ? static_obj+0x95/0xd0
> > [ 564.345782] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x1a5/0x800
> > [ 564.345794] idpf_vport_intr_ena+0x5ef/0x9f0 [idpf]
> > [ 564.345814] idpf_vport_open+0x2cc/0x1240 [idpf]
> > [ 564.345837] idpf_open+0x6d/0xc0 [idpf]
> > [ 564.345850] __dev_open+0x241/0x420
> >
> > Fixes: d4d558718266 ("idpf: initialize interrupts and enable vport")
> > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> I see that this now matches the implementation of idpf_intr_reg_init().
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <krishneil.k.singh@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists