netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 1/1] idpf: Don't hard code napi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240925203324.GD4029621@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 21:33:24 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
	"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/1] idpf: Don't hard code napi_struct size

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 06:00:17PM +0000, Joe Damato wrote:
> The sizeof(struct napi_struct) can change. Don't hardcode the size to
> 400 bytes and instead use "sizeof(struct napi_struct)".
> 
> While fixing this, also move other calculations into compile time
> defines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>