netdev - Re: [PATCH net 00/14] Netfilter fixes for net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240926103737.GA15517@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:37:37 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, fw@...len.de, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 00/14] Netfilter fixes for net

Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 9/24/24 22:13, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:
> > 
> > Patch #1 and #2 handle an esoteric scenario: Given two tasks sending UDP
> > packets to one another, two packets of the same flow in each direction
> > handled by different CPUs that result in two conntrack objects in NEW
> > state, where reply packet loses race. Then, patch #3 adds a testcase for
> > this scenario. Series from Florian Westphal.
> 
> Kdoc complains against the lack of documentation for the return value in the
> first 2 patches: 'Returns' should be '@...urn'.

:-(

Apparently this is found via

scripts/kernel-doc -Wall -none <file>

I'll run this in the future, but, I have to say, its encouraging me
to just not write such kdocs entries in first place, no risk of making
a mistake.

Paolo, Pablo, what should I do now?