[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZvU5rhGYpmGV_FVx@calendula>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:38:38 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 00/14] Netfilter fixes for net
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On 9/24/24 22:13, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:
> > >
> > > Patch #1 and #2 handle an esoteric scenario: Given two tasks sending UDP
> > > packets to one another, two packets of the same flow in each direction
> > > handled by different CPUs that result in two conntrack objects in NEW
> > > state, where reply packet loses race. Then, patch #3 adds a testcase for
> > > this scenario. Series from Florian Westphal.
> >
> > Kdoc complains against the lack of documentation for the return value in the
> > first 2 patches: 'Returns' should be '@...urn'.
>
> :-(
>
> Apparently this is found via
>
> scripts/kernel-doc -Wall -none <file>
>
> I'll run this in the future, but, I have to say, its encouraging me
> to just not write such kdocs entries in first place, no risk of making
> a mistake.
>
> Paolo, Pablo, what should I do now?
I am going to fix it and resubmit PR.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists