lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVJWLXQ--JKJzRX6JiEdzq5zPwN+qB65B9j7DTRGJpsTh1eDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:35:56 -0700
From: Greg Dowd <dowdgreg@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: skb_shared_hwstamps ability to handle 64 bit seconds and nanoseconds

Hello all,
I am not sure if this is the right list but I posted this in newbies
and got referred here.  Anyone have any insight?


I had a question regarding kernel timestamping.  I see definitions for
SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW in networking options to allow use of time
structures containing 64bit timestamps.  However, I don't see any way
for skbuff timestamps to pass around structures with 64 bits as the
skb_shared_hwstamps use a typedef ktime_t which stacks the seconds and
nanoseconds into a single 64bit value.
I am not sure who maintains this section of the code.  Any ideas?

thanks...Greg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ