netdev - Re: [PATCH] vsock/virtio: use GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241003013353.116203-1-luigi.leonardi@outlook.com>
Date: Thu,  3 Oct 2024 03:33:53 +0200
From: Luigi Leonardi <luigix25@...il.com>
To: mst@...hat.com
Cc: brauner@...nel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	eperezma@...hat.com,
	jasowang@...hat.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	luigi.leonardi@...look.com,
	marco.pinn95@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	sgarzare@...hat.com,
	stefanha@...hat.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
	xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsock/virtio: use GFP_ATOMIC under RCU read lock

> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/hfcr2aget2zojmqpr4uhlzvnep4vgskblx5b6xf2ddosbsrke7@nt34bxgp7j2x
> Fixes: efcd71af38be ("vsock/virtio: avoid queuing packets when intermediate queue is empty")
> Reported-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> Cc: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> Lightly tested. Christian, could you pls confirm this fixes the problem
> for you? Stefano, it's a holiday here - could you pls help test!
> Thanks!
>
>
>  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> index f992f9a216f0..0cd965f24609 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static u32 virtio_transport_get_local_cid(void)
>
>  /* Caller need to hold vsock->tx_lock on vq */
>  static int virtio_transport_send_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct virtqueue *vq,
> -				     struct virtio_vsock *vsock)
> +				     struct virtio_vsock *vsock, gfp_t gfp)
>  {
>  	int ret, in_sg = 0, out_sg = 0;
>  	struct scatterlist **sgs;
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct virtqueue *vq,
>  		}
>  	}
>
> -	ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, out_sg, in_sg, skb, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, out_sg, in_sg, skb, gfp);
>  	/* Usually this means that there is no more space available in
>  	 * the vq
>  	 */
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
>  		reply = virtio_vsock_skb_reply(skb);
>
> -		ret = virtio_transport_send_skb(skb, vq, vsock);
> +		ret = virtio_transport_send_skb(skb, vq, vsock, GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
>  			virtio_vsock_skb_queue_head(&vsock->send_pkt_queue, skb);
>  			break;
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_skb_fast_path(struct virtio_vsock *vsock, struc
>  	if (unlikely(ret == 0))
>  		return -EBUSY;
>
> -	ret = virtio_transport_send_skb(skb, vq, vsock);
> +	ret = virtio_transport_send_skb(skb, vq, vsock, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  	if (ret == 0)
>  		virtqueue_kick(vq);
>
> --
> MST
>
>

Thanks for fixing this!

I enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP as Stefano suggested and tested with and
without the fix, I can confirm that this fixes the problem.

Reviewed-by: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>