[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb96b56a-0c00-4f57-b4b5-8a7e00065cdc@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:32:54 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
willemb@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/12] net-timestamp: open gate for
bpf_setsockopt
On 10/11/24 9:06 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> char *optval, int *optlen,
> bool getopt)
> {
> + struct so_timestamping ts;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> switch (optname) {
> case SO_REUSEADDR:
> case SO_SNDBUF:
> @@ -5225,6 +5245,13 @@ static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> break;
> case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
> break;
> + case SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW:
> + case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD:
How about remove the "_OLD" support ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists