[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <670ee4efea023_322ac329445@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:55:59 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
dsahern@...nel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
willemb@...gle.com,
ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/12] net-timestamp: open gate for
bpf_setsockopt
Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 10/11/24 9:06 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> > static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> > char *optval, int *optlen,
> > bool getopt)
> > {
> > + struct so_timestamping ts;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > switch (optname) {
> > case SO_REUSEADDR:
> > case SO_SNDBUF:
> > @@ -5225,6 +5245,13 @@ static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> > break;
> > case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
> > break;
> > + case SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW:
> > + case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD:
>
> How about remove the "_OLD" support ?
+1 I forgot to mention that yesterday.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists