netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: phy: Refactor mediatek-ge-soc.c for clarity and correctness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241016185812.GN2162@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:58:12 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤) <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>
Cc: "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dqfext@...il.com" <dqfext@...il.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Steven Liu (劉人豪) <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	"daniel@...rotopia.org" <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: phy: Refactor mediatek-ge-soc.c for
 clarity and correctness

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 04:25:14PM +0000, SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤) wrote:
> > I do think that would be best.
> > But if you strongly think otherwise I can try to review it as-is.
> 
> Hi Simon,
>   If this does cause trouble for reviewing, I can split it into a few
> patches:
> Patch 1: Fix spelling errors + reverse Xmas tree + remove unnecessary
> parens
> Patch 2: Shrink mtk-ge-soc.c line wrapping to 80 characters.
> Patch 3: Propagate error code correctly in cal_cycle() + FIELD_GET()
> change
> Patch 4: Fix multi functions with FIELD_PREP().
> 
>   Is this okay for you? Do I need to split them into more patches?

Yes, I think that is a good way to split things up.