[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4a59558-bdfd-4597-87c4-70270e3adb96@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:49:11 -0500
From: Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>
To: <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <martin.habets@...inx.com>,
<edward.cree@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/26] cxl: add function for type2 cxl regs setup
On 10/17/24 11:52 AM, alejandro.lucero-palau@....com wrote:
> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>
> Create a new function for a type2 device initialising
> cxl_dev_state struct regarding cxl regs setup and mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/cxl/cxl.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 99acc258722d..f0f7e8bd4499 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -1141,6 +1141,53 @@ int cxl_pci_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_pci_setup_regs, CXL);
>
> +static int cxl_pci_setup_memdev_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> +{
> + struct cxl_register_map map;
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = cxl_pci_setup_regs(pdev, CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV, &map,
> + cxlds->capabilities);
> + /*
> + * This call returning a non-zero value is not considered an error since
> + * these regs are not mandatory for Type2. If they do exist then mapping
> + * them should not fail.
> + */
> + if (rc)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return cxl_map_device_regs(&map, &cxlds->regs.device_regs);
> +}
I think you can use this function for type 3 device set up in cxl_pci_probe() as well with
a minor change. Instead of
if (rc)
return 0;
above, you could do
if (rc) {
if (cxlds->type == CXL_DEVTYPE_CLASSMEM)
return rc;
return 0;
}
instead and replace the memdev cxl_pci_setup_regs() call in cxl_pci_probe().
> +int cxl_pci_accel_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = cxl_pci_setup_memdev_regs(pdev, cxlds);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + rc = cxl_pci_setup_regs(pdev, CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT,
> + &cxlds->reg_map, cxlds->capabilities);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No component registers (%d)\n", rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + if (!test_bit(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS, cxlds->capabilities))
> + return rc;
If you make the modification above, I think this is just a drop-in replacement for
the component register set up code in cxl_pci_probe(). I may be wrong (it's EOD here
and my brain is a little tired), but it could be a nice cleanup if so.
> +
> + rc = cxl_map_component_regs(&cxlds->reg_map,
> + &cxlds->regs.component,
> + BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS));
> + if (rc)
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_pci_accel_setup_regs, CXL);
> +
> bool cxl_pci_check_caps(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, unsigned long *expected_caps,
> unsigned long *current_caps)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/cxl/cxl.h b/include/linux/cxl/cxl.h
> index 78653fa4daa0..2f48ee591259 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #define __CXL_H
>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>
> enum cxl_resource {
> CXL_RES_DPA,
> @@ -52,4 +53,5 @@ int cxl_set_resource(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct resource res,
> bool cxl_pci_check_caps(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
> unsigned long *expected_caps,
> unsigned long *current_caps);
> +int cxl_pci_accel_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds);
> #endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists